C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) SINCE all these quash proceedings arise out of the same P. R. C. they are being disposed of by a Common Order. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners in these petitions, having formed themselves into an unlawful assembly with a common object to commit theft of paddy crop in the fields of Gara Israil and Nakka vemaiah, had committed theft of their paddy, and abused Gara Israil and Nakka Vemaiah, who belong to Scheduled Caste community, in their caste name and insulted them in public view and hence, are liable for punishment for offences under Sections 143 and 379 IPC and 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled castes, Scheduled Tribes (POA) Act, 1989 (the Act ).

( 2 ) THE contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is, since A-1 to A-62, even according to the charge-sheet, are members of Scheduled Caste community, proceedings against A-1 to A-62 under the act are liable to be quashed. It is contended that since A-63 to A-66, are leaders their rivals got a false complaint filed against them and that that fact is evident because the charge-sheet does not show who among 66 accused uttered the offending words and since all the accused could not have,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document