SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1037

T.CH.SURYA RAO
Syed Hameeduddin – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


T. SURYA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, who seeks bail, has been arrayed as A - 19 in the crime, which is pending investigation, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 255, 258, 259, 260, 263 (A), 420, 471, 472, 474, 34 of the Indian Penal Code r/w sections 64 (c) and 69 (b) of the Indian Stamp act and Sections 3 (1) (ii), 3 (2), 3 (4), 3 (5) and 4 of Andhra Pradesh Control of Organized crime Act, 2001 (for short "apcoca" ).

( 2 ) THE Government of Andhra Pradesh have constituted a Stamps Investigation team (S. I. T.) for investigation of the fake stamps cases. Consequently, all the crimes that have been registered earlier at various police stations have been brought within the purview of S. I. T. Having regard to the magnitude of the crime and its area of operation having been spread over in different States in the country, the investigation in this case has been entrusted to Central Bureau of Investigation, pursuant to the orders passed by the Apex Court.

( 3 ) DURING the course of investigation, A-2 in the crime is said to have made a confession before the competent authority, which reveals the involvement of the petitioner in the crime. Inasmuch as confession m

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top