ELIPE DHARMA RAO
Bikkina Satyzanarayana – Appellant
Versus
Reddy Lakshmi – Respondent
( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as arrayed in the trial Court. The facts leading to filing of the above second appeal, briefly narrated, are that the plaintiff is the owner of the plaint schedule property by virtue of the registered sale deed dated 29-5-1981 along with some other properties that are situated to the north of the plaint schedule property. She purchased the said site from one Pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.