( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed this writ petition questioning the order, dated 13. 7. 2000 of the 2nd respondent.

( 2 ) THE 2nd respondent, passed the impugned order in the review petition, filed by the petitioner against the order of removal from service, dated 3. 5. 2000 confirmed by the appellate authority, vide proceedings dated 20. 6. 2000. The 2nd respondent in the impugned order upheld the charges proved against the petitioner as the action taken by the disciplinary authority is quite justified, but however, a lenient view has been taken by appointing him afresh as Conductor Grade-II. That order has been questioned by the petitioner on the ground that the action of the respondents in appointing him as Conductor Grade-11 afresh without continuing him in the service and without back wages and other attendant benefits as illegal and arbitrary.

( 3 ) THE petitioner, while performing his duties as Conductor on 18. 12. 1999 on the vehicle bearing No. AP10z 2801 on the route Hyderabad to Cuddapah, a surprise check was made at the alighting point i. e. , Cuddapah Bus-Station on arrival from Hyderabad and he was found committing certain cash and ticket irregularities,