SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1246

P.S.NARAYANA
Gorentla Sreenu – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant/sole accused in S. C. No. 20/96 on the file of Special Sessions judge for trial of cases under Scheduled castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of atrocities) Act-cum-Additional District and sessions Judge, Prakasam Division, aggrieved by the Judgment dt. 21-12-1998 had preferred the present Criminal Appeal.

( 2 ) THE appellant/accused was charged with Section 307 IPC and also under section 3 of Scheduled Castes and scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) act, 1989. The same was numbered as P. R. C. No. 26/94 on the file of Judicial Magistrate of first Class, Ongole and the same was committed to the Court of Session. The case of the prosecution is that one Kokila venkayamma of Chimakurthy who was a harijan, lost her husband and was living with her parents and accused developed illicit intimacy with her and was visiting the house. Her mother Mannem Ankamma objected to it and asked the accused not to visit their house and Venkayamma to severe her connections with him since there was unmarried daughter. In spite of that the accused insisted Kokila Venkayamma to continue illicit intimacy and was harassing her and that he threatened her mother







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top