SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1231

C.V.RAMULU, DEVENDER GUPTA
Indian Industrial Mineral Producers Welfare Association, Chennai – Appellant
Versus
Government of India – Respondent


C. V. RAMULU, J.

( 1 ) AT the outset, we may note that this is a probono publico litigation filed by Indian Industrial Mineral producers Welfare Association, represented by its Secretary P. Lakshmana Perumal, chennai, Tamilnadu, complaining that the mining lease granted in favour of the 4th respondent - M/s. Transworld Garnet India private Limited - is contrary to the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and regulation) Act, 1957 (for short mmrd act ) and the Rules made thereunder, apart from the Atomic Energy Act, 1962 and the rules framed thereunder.

( 2 ) IT is stated that India has large reserves of beach sand minerals in the coastal stretches around the country. Ilmenite is the largest constituent of the Indian deposits and the others being Rutile, leucoxene, Zircon, Garnet and Monazite. The minerals other than Garnet and sillimanite have been classified as prescribed substances under the Atomic Energy Act, 1962. Under the said Act, it is mandatory to obtain licences from the designated competent authority in the Department of atomic Energy for working of any mines and minerals from which prescribed substances can be obtained as well as for acquisition, production
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top