SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1286

K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
Ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
Dinesan – Respondent


K. PADMANABHAN NAIR, J.

( 1 ) THE revision petitioner was found guilty of an offence punishable under Sec. 138 of the negotiable Instruments Act, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 35,000/- and in case of default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. He filed Crl. A. No. 122 of 1999 before the sessions Court challenging the conviction and sentence. The learned Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction, but modified the sentence to that of a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. This Criminal revision Petition is filed challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner.

( 2 ) THE first respondent filed a complaint against the revision petitioner alleging that he borrowed an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- from him and when a demand for repayment of that amount was made, Ext, P-1 cheque was issued. It was also alleged that when the cheque was presented for collection, the same was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds in the account maintained by the revision petitioner with the Bank. A notice demanding repayment of the amount covered by the cheque was issued. But, the rev









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top