K.PADMANABHAN NAIR
Ramachandran – Appellant
Versus
Dinesan – Respondent
( 1 ) THE revision petitioner was found guilty of an offence punishable under Sec. 138 of the negotiable Instruments Act, convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 35,000/- and in case of default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. He filed Crl. A. No. 122 of 1999 before the sessions Court challenging the conviction and sentence. The learned Sessions Judge confirmed the conviction, but modified the sentence to that of a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for three months. This Criminal revision Petition is filed challenging the conviction and sentence imposed on the petitioner.
( 2 ) THE first respondent filed a complaint against the revision petitioner alleging that he borrowed an amount of Rs. 1,25,000/- from him and when a demand for repayment of that amount was made, Ext, P-1 cheque was issued. It was also alleged that when the cheque was presented for collection, the same was dishonoured for want of sufficient funds in the account maintained by the revision petitioner with the Bank. A notice demanding repayment of the amount covered by the cheque was issued. But, the rev
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.