SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1326

S.R.K.PRASAD, G.BIKSHAPATHY
Jandhalaya Krishna Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Tullimilli Kotaiah – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J, J.

( 1 ) ALL the matters are placed before the Division Bench for answering the references made by the learned Brother p. S. Narayana, J. The issues arise under the provisions of A. P. (Andhra Area) Tenancy act, 1956 (hereinafter called the act ).

( 2 ) THE circumstances leading to the reference as spelt out from the Order of reference of the learned Judge are briefly narrated hereunder.

( 3 ) THE Revision Petitioners are the landlords and the respondents are the tenants. The tenants filed petitions before the Special Officer, Guntur for a declaration that they are the cultivating tenants and consequential relief of perpetual injunction restraining the landlords from interfering with the possession over the petition schedule lands. The original authority allowed the applications of the tenants as prayed for. Aggrieved by the said Order of the original authority, they filed appeals before the appellate authority District Judge, Guntur. The learned appellate authority also dismissed the appeals filed by the landlords thereby confirming the Order of the Special officer. Aggrieved by the said Order of the appellate authority, the present revisions have been preferre



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top