SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1300

V.V.S.RAO
L. SHANKARAIAH – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners in these writ petitions (73 petitioners in writ petition No. 14791 of 2004 and 244 petitioners in writ petition No. I 5938 of 2004) initially filed these writ petitions praying this court the following relief. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, it is hereby prayed that this Hon ble court may be pleaded to issue a writ, Order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the reservation order in S. O. 557 (c), dated 26. 7. 1996 issued under sub-Section (1) of Section 3 of the handlooms (reservation of articles for production) act, 1985, as illegal, and unenforceable and issue a consequential direction to the first respondent to reconstitute the committee under Section 4 of the act with adequate representation from powerloom industry and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

( 2 ) THIS court admitted the writ petition No. 14791 of 2004 on 20. 8. 2004 and passed interim orders directing stay of all further proceedings in respect of the petitioners. Respondents 3 to 6 filed an application being w. v. m. p. No. 2610 of 2004 to vacate the int
































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top