( 1 ) FOURTH respondent in the writ petition is the appellant and is aggrieved by the order of the learned single Judge allowing the writ petitioni of Respondent No. 1. While allowing the writ petition, the learned single Judge directed the fourth respondent (Respondent no. 3 in the Writ Petition) to examine the letter dated 26-10-2004 received from the superintending Engineer (Electrical), CPWD and if the clarification satisfies the condition of the tender, to accept the technical bid of the writ petitioner/respondent No. 1 and on acceptance thereof to open its price bid and forward the same to the third respondent herein for consideration along with the price bid of the appellant and to take appropriate decision thereupon in terms of the tender notice.

( 2 ) FOURTH respondent issued tender notice dated 7-9-2004 for execution of the work of development of new internal roads, footpaths, parking, landscaping and providing MS grill etc. , in A. P. Secretariat, hyderabad. Bidders were required to offer technical bids and price bids. Technical bid was required to be opened on 1 -10-2004 but the date was postponed and it was opened on 25-10-2004. Besides the appellant