SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1504

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, calcutta – Appellant
Versus
SUSRU SEA FOODS – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS civil revision petition under art. 227 of the constitution of India is directed against the Order, dated 26-10-2004, made in i. a. No. 1523 of 2004 in o. s. No. 639 of 1997 on the file of the learned i additional senior civil judge, visakhapatnam, whereunder the learned judge allowed the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff to summon two witnesses viz. , V. Raj Kumar and Capt. P. Jacob Rao, in the interest of Justice.

( 2 ) RESPONDENT/plaintiff got himself examined as P. W. 1 and another witness was examined as P. W. 2. On behalf of the petitioners/defendants d. ws. 1 and 2 were examined and their evidence was closed.

( 3 ) IT is the case of the respondent/plaintiff that the petitioners/defendants did not examine one V. Raj Kumar who dealt with the matter concerned to the suit. Likewise, the surveyor of imsaco, Capt. P. Jacob Rao, who was also present throughout, at the time of salvage operations, was not examined by the petitioners/defendants. Their evidence would be crucial in order to arrive at just and proper conclusions in the suit. It is also the case of the respondent/ plaintiff that the petitioners/defendants who were supposed to ex




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top