S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) BOTH these Civil Revision Petitions arise out of the Judgment rendered in R. A. No. 32 of 1998 on the file of the Additional Chief judge, City Small Causes Court, at hyderabad.

( 2 ) FOR the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in the R. C. No. 301 of 1995 on the file of I Additional rent Controller, at Hyderabad.

( 3 ) THE brief resume of admitted facts are necessary to consider the case in both the civil Revision Petitions. It is an undisputed fact that the premises is owned by the landlord, who is the petitioner in R. C. No. 301 of 1995 on the file of the I Additional rent Controller, at Hyderabad.

( 4 ) THE schedule premises was said to have been let out to the first respondent on a monthly rent of Rs. 165/- exclusive of the electricity charges which are directly payable by the first respondent to the Electricity department. The schedule premises was constructed in the year 1950 and let out orally. The premises consists of three rooms, open yard, bathroom, toilet and well. The petitioner has presented R. C. No. 301 of 1995 under Section 10 (2) (ii) (a), 10 (2) (iii)and 10 (3) (a) (i) (b) of the A. P. Buildings (Lease, rent and Evi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document