( 1 ) HEARD both sides.

( 2 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the docket order dated 13-10-2004 in I. A. No. 921 of 2004 in o. S. No. 357 of 2004 passed by the Principal senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi, allowing the application filed by the respondent/plaintiff under Order 26 Rule 9 C. P. C. for appointment of an Advocate-Commissioner to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property and to file his report.

( 3 ) PETITIONER is the 4th defendant ino. S. No. 357 of 2004 on the file of Principal senior Civil Judge s Court at Tirupathi. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit for specific performance. The other facts are not required to be mentioned in detail for the purpose of disposal of this revision petition.

( 4 ) FOR the purpose of convenience, in thisorder, parties will be referred to according to their array in the suit

( 5 ) THE undisputed facts are that on13-10-2004 the plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants. Along with the suit, plaintiff also filed I. A. No. 921 of 2004 under Order 26 rule 9 C. P. C. seeking appointment of an advocate-Commissioner to note down the physic