SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1450

K.C.BHANU, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
M. YADAGIRI REDDY – Appellant
Versus
V. C. BRAHMANNA – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE judgment of the special court under the Andhra Pradesh land grabbing (prohibition) act, 1982 (for short the act ) made in l. g. c. No. 48 of 2002 dated 15-7-2004 directing the petitioner to vacate the schedule property and deliver vacant possession of the same to the 1st respondent herein has been impugned in this writ petition. Facts in brief:

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the dispute between the parties are that, according to the 1st respondent, he had purchased the schedule land admeasuring an extent of acs. 12. 00 located in sy. Nos. 33/6 to 33/10 of chengicherla, ghatkesari mandal, ranga reddy district by means of a registered sale deed dated 21-5-1969 from one ponnapu chandraiah and others and has been in possession and enjoyment of the same from the date of purchase. He got fenced the schedule land on three sides and no fencing was made on the southern side of the schedule property. His manager one d. Venkata rao visited the land on 3-8-2002, to remove the shrubs in the land for the purpose of development. The petitioner obstructed his manager. Though a police report was submitted, no action was taken. The petitioner has no title to the schedule













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top