SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(AP) 1556

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, T.MEENA KUMARI
Lanka Nirmala Devi – Appellant
Versus
V. Rama Devi – Respondent


T. MEENA KUMARI, J.

( 1 ) THE present appeals have been filed against the common judgment and decrees dated 4. 9. 1998 in O. S. Nos. 28, 13 of 1996 and os No. 73 of 1997 on the file of the Senior civil Judge, Mahaboobabad, Warangal district. The learned Senior Civil Judge dismissed OS. No. 28 of 1996 and the suits in OS Nos. 13 of 1996 and 73 of 1997 have been decreed for partition of the suit schedule property to an extent of Ac. 5. 05 guntas only comprised in Survey No. 4 situate at Torrur Village into four equal shares and declared that each plaintiff is entitled to have l/4th share.

( 2 ) QUESTIONING the said common judgment, the present appeals have been filed. The appellants in AS. No. 2404 of 1998 are Defendants 3 and 4 in OS. No. 73 of 1997 and the first respondent is the plaintiff and Respondents 2 to 6 are Defendants 1, 2 and 5 to 7. The appellant in AS. No. 763 of 1999 is the plaintiff in OS. No. 28 of 1996 and the respondents are defendants in the said suit; whereas AS. No. 9 of 1999 has been filed by Defendants 5 and 6 in os. No. 28 of 1996 and the first respondent in AS. No. 9 of 1996 is the plaintiff in os. No. 28 of 1996 and the appellant in as. No. 763 of 1999. Res





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top