SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 4

L.NARASIMHA REDDY
Titan Watches Limited, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
Senior Inspector,. Legal Metrology Weights and Measures Dept. ,mehboobnagar – Respondent


L. NARASIMHA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is a manufacturer of wrist watches. It has got its distributors all over the country and one of its distribution point is at Mahabubnagar. On 28-12-1982 the Senior Inspector of Legal Metrology, Weights and Measurements Department, Mahabubnagar, A. P. the first respondent herein, inspected the shop of the petitioner and on finding that various specifications as to the date of manufacture, the price etc. , have not been printed on the container, he has seized certain watches and issued show cause notice alleging contravention of Section 39 of the Standards of weights and Measurements Act, 1976, herein after referred to as the Act and the standards of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 1977 hereinafter to as the Rules. In the show cause notice dated 2-1-1993, it is also indicated that the contravention alleged against the petitioner is compoundable under S. 73 of the Act.

( 2 ) ON receipt of the notice the petitioner has submitted its reply dated 8-1-1993 and one of its contention was that the provisions of the Act and Rules do not apply to the watches for the reason that they do not come within the definition of packaged comm









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top