SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 28

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
V. Sallaja – Appellant
Versus
V. Koteswara Rao – Respondent


GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J.

( 1 ) AS the parties i to all these petitions are one and the same and the contentions raised by them are common, all these Transfer C. M. Ps. are disposed of by common judgment. For the sake of convenienpe, the parties herein are referred to as they are arrayed in Transfer C. M. P. No. 463 of 2000, which is filed by wife.

( 2 ) TRANSFER C. M. P. No. 463 of 2000 is filed by the petitioner (wife) seeking transfer of O. P. No. 416 of 2000 from the file of the Family Court, Vijayawada, to the Senior civil Judge g Court, Vizianagaram.

( 3 ) WHILE so, Transfer C. M. P. No. 1 of 2002 is filed by the respondent (husband) seeking transfer of O. P. No. 15 of 2001 from the file of the Senior Civil Judge s Couft, vizianagaram, to the Family Court, vijayawada. Similarly, Transfer C. M. P. No. 4352 of 2002 is filed by the husband seeking transfer of M. C. No. 62 of 2000 from the file of Additional Judicial I Class Magistrate s Court, Vizianagaram, to the Family court, Vijayawada.

( 4 ) THE facts which led to the filing of these petitions are as follows: Both the petitioner and the respondent hail from angaluru1 village in Krishna District. The marriage between them took

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top