SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 23

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
Kottam Pullaiah – Appellant
Versus
Harijan Panganti Eaga Balaiah – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed by the decree holders - plaintiffs in O. S. No. 45 of 1980 on the file of the District Munsif, Wanaparthy, questioning the order dated 19. 3. 2001 in E. A. No. 15 of 2000 in E. P. No. 12 of 1996 on the file of Junior Civil Judge, Wanaparthy.

( 2 ) NECESSARY facts for the disposal of this revision petition are as follows:the revision petitioners were having land in Sy. No. 115. It was acquired by the Government for the purpose of constructing a well in a tank named as Gundla Cheruvu. In lieu of the acquisition of the land belonging to the revision petitioners in Sy. No. 115, the Government assigned some other land to them in Sy. Nos. 10-A and 10-B. Later, on the ground that the defendants in the suit were obstructing the enjoyment of assigned land by the plaintiffs, they filed a suit in O. S. No. 45 of 1980 seeking declaration of their title and for perpetual injunction against the defendants. The District Collector, Mahaboobnagar, and the Tahsildar, Wanaparthy are the defendants 1 and 2 in the said suit. The suit was contested by all the defendants. One of the contentions taken by the defendants 1 and 2 is that in lieu






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top