SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 67

N.V.RAMANA
Cable Corporation of India Ltd. , Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Sanghi Industries Ltd. – Respondent


N. V. RAMANA, J.

( 1 ) M/s. Cable Corporation of India Limited, represented by its Regional Manager, Sri Ashok Gupta, has filed these two Company Applications.

( 2 ) BY C. A. No. 556 of 2002, filed under Order XIII, Rule 2 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as amended by Act 22 of 2002 (for short the Code), and Rules 6 and 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 (for short the Rules ), the applicant seeks permission of the Court to produce the list of documents, appended to the application, by condoning the delay, if any, in producing the same. While, by C. A. No. 557 of 2002, filed under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 151 of the Code and Rules 6 and 9 of the Rules, the applicant seeks permission of the Court to produce Xerox copies of the Letter of Intent dated 27-1-1995 and the Purchase Order dated 10-7-1995, placed by the respondent.

( 3 ) ONE Sri K. G. Narasimhan, who claims to be Retainer of the applicant-company, filed an affidavit in support of the applications, stating as follows :

( 4 ) THE applicant-company filed Company Petition under Section 433 (e) read with Sections 434 (1) (a) and 439 (1) (b) of the Companies





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top