DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal against the judgment and decree dated 16. 12. 1997 in A. S. No. 178 of 1991 on the file of 1st Additional District Judge at chittoor (A. S. No. 98 of 1990 on the file of HI Additional District Judge, Tinipati) confirming the judgment and decree dated 17. 9. 1990 in O. S. No. 124 of 1987 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Tirupati. Defendants in the suit are the appellants.

( 2 ) NECESSARY facts for the disposal of this appeal are as follows: bollini Munaswamy Naidu was the owner of plaint schedule property. He was having two daughters, namely, Lakshmamma and kamala. He got married both the daughters to one and the same person by name medasani Chengama Naidu. Plaintiff is the son of the first daughter Lakshmamma. Defendants 1 to 3 are the sons of the second daughter Kamala. On 30. 7. 1947 Bollini munaswamy Naidu and his two sons including P. W. 2 executed a registered settlement deed Ex. A1 gifting the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff and first defendant who were then minors. The other male issues to be born later were given similar rights in the same property. The two sisters are appointed as guardians of their mi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document