SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 108

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
Sannidhi Ratnavathi – Appellant
Versus
Arava Narasimha Murthy – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) IS appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 17th september, 1991 in A. S. No. 69 of 1983 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Tanuku confirming the judgment and decree dated 30-8-1982 in O. S. No. 638 of 1978 on the file of i Additional District Munsif, Tanuku.

( 2 ) REFERENCE to the parties will be made as they are arrayed in the suit. Plaintiffs father Suranha executed a registered settlement deed dated 26-7-1963 (Ex. Al) in favour of the plaintiff gifting the plaint schedule property to the plaintiff. However, plaintiffs father retained the life estate in himself and gifted only the vested remainder to the plaintiff. Subsequently, plaintiffs father individually and as guardian of the minor plaintiff sold the suit property to the 1st defendant under a registered sale deed dated 22-1-1975 (Ex. Bl ). Plaintiffs father died intestate on 7-6-1975. After the death of his father, plaintiff demanded the defendants who are wife and husband to vacate and deliver possession of the suit property to the plaintiff and to pay him rents at the rate of rs. 60/- per month from 7-6-1975. Plaintiff pleaded in his plaint that he attained majority on 15-3-197













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top