SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 102

GODA RAGHURAM
Arigela Laxmi – Appellant
Versus
Boodireddy Chandraiah – Respondent


GODA RAGHURAM, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants herein are the defendants in O. S. No. 149 of 1995 on the file of the principal Junior Civil Judge, Karimnagar. The respondents herein filed the suit for declaration of title and perpetual injunction claiming to be the owners and possessors of an extent of Ac. 1. 15 gts, and Ac. 1. 14 gts, in sy. Nos. 95/a and 95/b respectively of bommakal village.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiffs is that when they obtained certified copies of the Pahanis for obtaining a loan from the Co-operative bank, they found that the Pahanis for the years 1980-81 to 1988-89, 1991-92 and 1992-93 recorded the name of the 1st defendant as the possessor, while the Pahani for the years 1989-90 the name of the 2nd defendant as the possessor. The plaintiffs approached the defendants to take steps to rectify the entries in the revenue records. The defendants refused and also denied the title of the plaintiffs. The defendants also came to the suit schedule property on 10-5-94 and tried to interfere with the petitioners possession. Hence the suit.

( 3 ) THE appellants herein resisted the suit contending that the father of the 2nd defendant purchased the land in sy. No. 95/a on 10-






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top