SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 131

GHULAM MOHAMMED
Geetanjali Wines, Nalgonda – Appellant
Versus
P. Bhaskar Reddy – Respondent


GHULAM MOHAMMED, J.

( 1 ) SINCE the controversy involved in these writ petitions is interconnected, both the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) WRIT Petition No. 18302 of 2002 is filed assailing the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in seizing the petitioner s IL-224 wine shop and stocks on 17-9-2002 vide FIR No. 353 of 2002-03, as bad in law, violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the judgment of this Court reported in 2002 (1) alt 108 (D. B.) and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to restrain themselves from illegally visiting/harassing the petitioner without following the due process of law and also for a further direction to the respondents 3 and 4 to initiate disciplinary proceedings against respondents 1 and 2 in the interest of justice.

( 3 ) THE complaint of the petitioner in this writ petition is that the Inspector, and the sub-Inspector of Nalgonda Excise Station, respondents 1 and 2 herein came to his shop with two persons on 16-9-2002 and also bought with them two bottles of whisky and they kept the same in the shop and made the nowkarnama holder to sign on the blank papers and thereafter the shop was locked with











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top