SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 152

DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM
Batchu Ramakrishna – Appellant
Versus
GGOLLA VENKATA KOTESWARA RAO – Respondent


DUBAGUNTA SUBRAHMANYAM, J.

( 1 ) THIS revision petition is filed under section 22 of A. P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short the act ) against the judgment dated 9-7-2001 in rca. No. 25 of 1997 on the file of Principal senior Civil Judge, Rajahmundry, confirming the order of eviction dated 28-7-1997 in RCC. No. 47 of 1986 on the file of the Rent Controller-cum-Principal District munsif, Rajahmundry. The tenants-respondents 3 and 4 in the eviction petition are the appellants.

( 2 ) NECESSARY averments for the disposal of this revision petition briefly are as follows: golla Subbayya, who is the father of the eviction petitioners, in or about 1964 leased out the petition schedule premises to the first respondent - Batchu China Koteswara rao on a monthly rent of Rs. l25=-00. From the year 1980 the monthly rent is Rs. 400=00. The petitioners sought the eviction of the tenant first respondent on three grounds. The first ground is that after taking the petition schedule premises for rent, the tenant installed an oil extractor in the schedule premises and its use caused damage to the building. The second ground is that petitioners 1 and 2 bona fide require t















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top