SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 196

P.S.NARAYANA
Mangali Satukuri Anjaiah – Appellant
Versus
Nethi Rajalah – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri T. Ramulu, the counsel representing the revision petitioner and sri J. Kanakayya, the counsel representing the respondents.

( 2 ) THIS Civil Revision Petition was filed along with an application for condonation of delay of one day and the delay was condoned and the matter is coming up for admission. At the stage of admission both the counsel requested that the main civil revision petition itself may be disposed of, for the reason, if the matter is delayed the disposal of the suits wills also be delayed. In view of the said representation made by both the counsel, at the stage of admission, the civil revision petition itself is being finally disposed of.

( 3 ) THE Civil Revision Petition is filed by the revision petitioner, the defendant in o. S. No. 4 of 2002 on the file of the Senior civil Judge at Siddipet aggrieved by an order dated 11-9-2002 which was made on the memo filed in O. S. No. 4 of 2002 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Siddepet, by the counsel for the petitioner. A memo was filed in O. S. No. 4 of 2002 on the file of the senior Civil Judge at Siddipet on the ground that the suit claim in O. S. No. 4 of 2002 and the suit claim







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top