SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 210

V.V.S.RAO
A. Ekambara Naicker – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer-Cum-Revenue Divisional Officer, sub-Collectors Office, Madanapalle, Chittoor District – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) AN extent of Acs. 58. 63 of land covered by S. No. 511/2 of Palamaneru village was acquired in 1988 for the purpose of establishing industrial estate by a. P. Industrial and Infrastructure Corporation Limited. An Award was passed being Award No. 1 of 1988 on 26. 8. 1988. The first respondent issued notice of Award as required under sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, the Act) to all the landowners on 26. 8. 1988. The petitioner, whose land admeasuring Ac. 1. 18 was acquired, was also issued such notice informing that compensation awarded by the first respondent will be paid to the land owners on 17. 9. 1988 at 11. 00 a. m. in the office of the Sub-Collector, Madanapalle, the first respondent herein. The petitioner also appeared before the first respondent and was paid an amount of Rs. 65,457. 05 ps. being compensation for Acs. 1. 18 covered by S. No. 536 belonging to him.

( 2 ) THE petitioner and thirty others filed a writ petition being W. P. No. 4570 of 1994 before this Court alleging that they received compensation under protest and requested the first respondent to make reference under Section 18 (1) of the Act to th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top