SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 249

P.S.NARAYANA
M. Venkata Subba Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Main Branch, Cuddapah – Respondent


HEARD SRI G. RAMESH, J.

( 1 ) COUNSEL representing Sri S. V. Bhatt, the learned Counsel for the appellant and M. Narender Reddy, the learned Counsel for the respondent.

( 2 ) THE Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed as against an order passed in LA No. 639/ 2001 in OS No. 88/2001 dated 9-7-2002 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Cuddapah. The order impugned reads as hereunder:"this petition was filed by the learned counsel Sri M. Nageswara Reddy. On perusal of the material on hand, there is no Vakalath for M. Nageswara Reddy, as such the very petition itself is not maintainable. Hence the same is dismissed, but no costs. "

( 3 ) THE facts in nutshell are as follows:

( 4 ) THE defendant in OS No. 88/2001 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Cuddapah filed IA No. 639/2001 praying for the relief of setting aside the exparte decree dated 28-8-2001 passed against him and receive the written statement and dispose of the matter on merits in the interest of justice. The respondent in the appeal, plaintiff in the suit, filed the suit for recovery of amount on the strength of a mortgage and it is stated in the affidavit that the appellant herein, defendant in the suit, appeared through a Counsel





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top