SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 300

G.BIKSHAPATHY, R.SUBHASH REDDY
M. Narsaiah – Appellant
Versus
P. Ranga Reddy – Respondent


G. BIKSHAPATHY, J.

( 1 ) ) all the Writ Petitions and the C. M. A. can be disposed of by a common judgment.

( 2 ) THE matter has chequered career and therefore, it is necessary to trace out the genealogy of the events. The disposal of the w. P. No. 20282 of 1999 will have bearing on the other matters and therefore, the averments contained in the said Writ petition are referred to hereinafter.

( 3 ) THE validity of the G. O. Ms. No. 675, dated: 7-9-1999 issued by the 1st respondent-Government of Andhra Pradesh is assailed in the said Writ Petition.

( 4 ) IT is the case of the petitioner that plot no. 19 of defunct Jubilee Hills Municipality situate in S. No. 129 (old) corresponding to new S. No. 403 of Shaikpet village, Road no. 10, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad belonged to one Syed Azam Ali. He sold the said plot to one Abdul Razack on 1-3-1950. In turn, the said Abdul Razack gifted the same to his daughter Niazi Begum. Petitioner and 18 others purchased the said land from Niazi begum through a sale transaction dated 14-2-1973. They filed suit in O. S. No. 971 of 1985 on the file of the IV Additional Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad against Niazi begum for a declaration of title and t


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top