SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 302

G.ROHINI
G. Parimala – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Bhatia – Respondent


G. ROHINI, J.

( 1 ) THIS Revision Petition is directed against the order dated 30-12-2002 in I. A. No. 1079 of 2002 in O. S. NO. 1930 of 2001 on the file of the court of the VII Senior Civil Judge, City civil Court, Hyderabad.

( 2 ) THE Revision Petitioner is the defendant in the suit, who is aggrieved by the order permitting the plaintiff to mark a xerox copy of a document as secondary evidence.

( 3 ) THE plaintiff/respondent herein filed the main suit for recovery of a sum of rs. 2. 00 lakhs alleged to be due from the defendant. The case of the plaintiff in the suit is that he was carrying on business along with the defendant, who is the proprietor of a firm. However, certain misunderstandings developed regarding the business transactions and the same were mutually settled between them in pursuance of which an undertaking dated 18-3-2001 was executed whereunder it was agreed that certain title deeds hypothecated by the plaintiff with Vijaya Bank in connection with the business shall be released and that in future the plaintiff is in no way concerned with the business of the defendant. The plaintiff claims that in pursuance of the said settlement he received two cheques for a sum o












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top