SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 332

P.S.NARAYANA
Viswender Arya – Appellant
Versus
Arya Pratinidhi Sabha, A. P. – Respondent


P. S. NARAYANA, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Sri Sarwabhouma Rao, learned counsel for the appellants and sri Venkataraghuramulu, learned counsel representing respondents 1 to 3.

( 2 ) THE order impugned in the present cma was made in I. A. No. 561/2003 in o. P. No. 549/2003 on the file of the Chief judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. Respondents 1 to 3 in the appeal as petitioners filed O. P. No. 549/2003 u/s 23 of the A. P. Societies Registration Act, 2001 praying for the reliefs of declaration of the alleged proceedings dated 20-11-2002 purporting to dissolve the duly elected governing body of the first petitioner as illegal, void ab initio and not binding on them and also declaring that the appointment of the alleged ad hoc committee under and in pursuance of the alleged proceedings dated 20-11-2002 as illegal, void ab initio and for permanent injunction restraining the respondents, their agents, servants, office bearers, employees, nominee or nominees, assignees etc. , from interfering with the affairs and management of the first petitioner and other institutions and for other appropriate reliefs. The petitioner moved I. A. No. 561/03 in the said O. P. u/s. 23 of A. P. Societies Registration








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top