( 37 ) IN such view of the matter, we have no hesitation to hold that the application filed by the respondents herein before the tribunal which was later transferred to the special Court is misconceived. The Special court ought not to have taken cognizance of the case under the Act. The application filed by the respondents - applicants ought to have been summarily dismissed.

( 38 ) NOW we shall take up the next contention urged by the learned senior counsel relating to the identity of the land alleged to have been grabbed by the petitioners herein. In the original petition filed by the respondents the entire extent of ac. 9. 26 gts. situated in S. No. 73, marredpally village, Hyderabad is mentioned as against the column "extent". The boundaries as against Column No. 12 are also given for the whole of the extent of ac. 9. 26 gts. In the prayer portion a declaration is sought as against the petitioners herein declaring them to be the land grabbers in respect of the land admeasuring Ac. 1. 38 gtss only in S. No. 73, marredpally village, Hyderabad District. It is specifically stated in categorical terms that the lands admeasuring Ac. 1. 38 gts. that remained after acquisition of an ext

Click Here to Read the rest of this document