SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 379

V.ESWARAIAH
Bolleddula Lakshmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Bolleddula Papanna – Respondent


V. ESWARAIAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein is the plaintiff in o. S. No. 94 of 1991 on the file of the learned senior Civil Judge, Nandyal. The said suit is filed for partition and separate possession of the petitioner s share in the suit schedule properties.

( 2 ) IT is evident from the record that whend. W1, during his examination-in-chief, filed. an insufficiently stamped and unregistered partition deed dated 22-3-1981 to receive the same as evidence by marking it as in exhibit, the petitioner-plaintiff took an objection for marking of the same. in the circumstances, the learned Senior Civil judge passed the docket order dt. 31-7-2001 admitting the said document into evidence, which reads as under:"after hearing the arguments of both sides, the partition deed which is unstamped and unregistered document though it is unregistered document and can be conferred on the status of admissibility upon the said document. So, the document which is an unregistered partition deed cannot be admissible in evidence, but it can be looked into for the collateral purpose for the limited purpose and also to show the severance of the status of the parties. Accordingly, the document can be admitted









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top