V.ESWARAIAH
Bolleddula Lakshmi Devi – Appellant
Versus
Bolleddula Papanna – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioner herein is the plaintiff in o. S. No. 94 of 1991 on the file of the learned senior Civil Judge, Nandyal. The said suit is filed for partition and separate possession of the petitioner s share in the suit schedule properties.
( 2 ) IT is evident from the record that whend. W1, during his examination-in-chief, filed. an insufficiently stamped and unregistered partition deed dated 22-3-1981 to receive the same as evidence by marking it as in exhibit, the petitioner-plaintiff took an objection for marking of the same. in the circumstances, the learned Senior Civil judge passed the docket order dt. 31-7-2001 admitting the said document into evidence, which reads as under:"after hearing the arguments of both sides, the partition deed which is unstamped and unregistered document though it is unregistered document and can be conferred on the status of admissibility upon the said document. So, the document which is an unregistered partition deed cannot be admissible in evidence, but it can be looked into for the collateral purpose for the limited purpose and also to show the severance of the status of the parties. Accordingly, the document can be admitted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.