SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 546

B.SUBHASHAN REDDY
Ramana Rao M. V. – Appellant
Versus
APSRTC – Respondent


S. SUBHASHAN REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, a driver of al -Category in the first respondent- Corporation, whose services are dispensed with on medical grounds, has filed this Writ Petition for Writ of mandamus, to issue appropriate directions to the respondents to give him any alternate suitable post, seeking assistance under the provisions of the Persons With Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Protection of Rights and full Participation) Act, 1995.

( 2 ) NECESSARY facts for disposal of the Writ petition are as under: The writ petitioner was appointed as driver in A1-Category and posted to Podili Depot of Prakasam District. It is his case that during the tenure of his employment, he suffered disease called tinnatus , which resulted in hearing impairment. As such, he is unfit to work as driver and the same is certified to that effect by the very authority of the State road Transport Corporation. As such, he made a representation requesting for providing of any desk job, which is equivalent to Al-Category driver. When the petitioner was not provided with alternative and suitable job and when he was forced to go on leave, earlier he filed Writ petition No. 18143 of 2002. This Court








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top