SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 568

V.V.S.RAO
Nachipeddi Ramaswamy – Appellant
Versus
P. Buchi Reddy – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is the plaintiff in O. S. No. 27 of 2002 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Kalwakurthy. The suit was filed for recovery of money. According to the petitioner, the suit summons were served on the sole defendant/respondent herein on 10-5-2002. The defendant appeared through counsel before the Court on 13-6-2002 and the Court granted time for filing written statement from time to time. Ultimately on 9-10-2002, the defendant filed a written statement and the Court accepted the same. None the less, the petitioner filed an application being I. A. No. 390 of 2002 under Order VIII, Rule 10 read with Section 151, CPC 1908 as amended by the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 1999 (Act 46 of 1999) and the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act 2002 (Act 22 of 2002 ). The petitioner prayed the trial Court to pronounce the judgment by rejecting the written statement filed by the defendant. The trial Court by the impugned order dated 3-3-2003 dismissed the petitioner s application holding that the defendant filed the written statement within the time permitted by the Court and therefore a judgment cannot be pronounced as per Rule 10 of










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top