SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 579

M.NARAYANA REDDY
Sohanlal Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Zakir Hussain – Respondent


M. NARAYANA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Judgment, according to Law, based on the legal material placed, on Record, arises out of a Second appeal, filed by the sole appellant, against the sole respondent, under Section 100, CPC, questioning the, validity and legality, of the adjudications made by, and set forth in para 2, infra.

( 2 ) JUDGMENT and Decree, both, dated 12-12-1994, of the Court of the Addl. Chief judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, made in A. S. No. 51/89, of its file, confirming, in toto, the earlier Judgment and Decree, both, dated 18-1-1989, of the Court of the XI asst. Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, made in O. S. No. 3410/84.

( 3 ) PERUSED the material papers of the record.

( 4 ) ARGUMENTS were heard of the learned Counsel for both the parties.

( 5 ) THE sole appellant in this Second appeal corresponds to the sole appellant in the said A. S. No. 51/89, of the said First appellate Court and the sole defendant in the said O. S. No. 3410/84, of the said Trial court The sole respondent herein corresponds to the sole respondent in that First Appeal, and the sole plaintiff in that suit.

( 6 ) THE parties are, hereinafter, referred to, with reference to their respectiv




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top