SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 581

GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA
S. V. S. KODANDA RAO – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


GOPALA KRISHNA TAMADA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant/sole accused, who was a Senior Assistant in mandal Revenue Office, Atreyapuram, East godavari District, was tried by the learned iii Additional District Judge-cum-Special judge for S. P. E A. C. B. Cases, Visakhapatnam, in C. C. No. 24 of 1995 for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 11 and 13 (2) read with 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of corruption Act, 1988 and Section 201 IPC and was ultimately found guilty of the said offences and accordingly sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months for the offence punishable under Section 7 of the PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION ACT, 1988; rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000/- in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months for the offence punishable under Section 13 (2) read with Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of corruption Act; and rigorous imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under Section 201 IPC.

( 2 ) THE substance of the charges framed against the appellant is that on 22-3-1990 at about 3. 40 p. m. at Mandal Revenue Office, atr
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top