SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 598

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, G.BIKSHAPATHY
B. R. Koteshwara Rao – Appellant
Versus
G. Rameshwari Bal – Respondent


C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) THIS Letters patent Appeal arises but of the Judgment In a. S. No. 1195 of 2002 and cross-objections. For the sake of convenience, the parties would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the trial Court.

( 2 ) PLAINTIFF filed the suit for declaration that Ex. B1 receipt dated 5-12-1974, said to have been executed by her in favour of the 1st defendant, is forged, and hence is void and inoperative, and for the consequential relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants and their men from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property or in the alternative for possession of the plaint schedule property by evicting the 1st defendant therefrom and consequential reliefs.

( 3 ) THE case, in brief, of the plaintiff is that she is the absolute owner of the plaint schedule property of 11 acres 9 guntas in s. No. 101 of Gundla Pochampally Village, medchal Taluq, Ranga Reddy District, having purchased it under a registered sale deed dated 26-10-1965 from B. Padmavathi Bal after obtaining permission from Tahsildar, medchal, and has been in possession thereof through her husband G. V. Reddy. After the deat
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top