SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 620

Chakrapani – Appellant
Versus
State OF A. P. Through Public Prosecutor – Respondent


K. C. BHANU, J.

( 1 ) THE sole accused in C. C. No. 121/1999 on the file of the learned Additional Munsif Magistrate, Karimnagar, filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the proceedings therein.

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the filing of the present petition in brief are that the 2nd respondent filed a private complaint on 18. 2. 1998 against the petitioner before the Court below alleging that the petitioner issued a cheuqe bearing No. 823222, dated 19. 7. 1997, for Rs. 90,000/ -. 2nd respondent presented the cheque on 7. 1. 1998 in the Bank. The cheque was dishonourd for insufficiency of funds. 2nd respondent received intimation on 15. 1. 1998 from his Bank about the dishonour of the cheque. Therefore, 2nd respondent issued a statutory demand notice on 25. 1. 1998 to the petitioner, which the petitioner received on 31. 1. 1998, calling upon him to make payment of the amount covered by the dishonoured cheque, but the petitioner did not choose to pay the amount. The private complaint was registered as C. C. No. 121/1998 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, for short, hereinafter to be referred to as the Act. The accused i









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top