SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 627

ELIPE DHARMA RAO
K. Prasada Rao – Appellant
Versus
SSUB-DIVISIONAL INSPECTOR (POSTAL), GIDDALUR – Respondent


ELIPE DHARMA RAO, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner filed an O. A. challenging order No. RD/lc/75-99, dated 27-4-2000 issued by the Post Master General, Kurnool region, Kurnool terminating the services of the petitioner. The petitioner was appointed as EDMC/da from 30th June, 1998. A notice was issued to him on 23-3-99 asking him why his services be not terminated in view of the report of the police regarding verification of his antecedents. Subsequently another notice was given to him on 5-6-99 asking him to submit his explanation within three days. These notices were challenged by the petitioner in O. A. No. 1339/99. This o. A. was dismissed by the Tribunal with the following order:"in view of the above we do not find any merits in this O. A. The O. A. has to be dismissed. However, the applicant has got a further grievance redressal machinery available to him by filing an appeal to the higher authorities i. e. , either to the Director of Postal Services or to the Post Master General of that division. He may take such action if he feels that he is not guilty of the charges. "thereafter, it appears that the petitioner filed an appeal against the notices issued to him and requested the appella







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top