SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 692

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, G.BIKSHAPATHY
M. Krishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Narasimha Rao – Respondent


C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) SINCE both the appeals are interconnected, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) L. P. A. NO. 11 of 1998 arises out of C. C. C. A. NO. 131 of 1994, which arose out of o. S. NO. 641 of 1988 on the file of the Court of iv Additional Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad. L. P. A. No. 65 of 1998 arises out of Tr. C. C. C. A. No. 26 of 1995, which arose out of O. S. No. 1369 of 1989 on the file of the court of IV Additional Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad, which was originally instituted as O. S. No. 4528 of 1987 on the file of the Court of VII Assistant Judge, City civil Court, Hyderabad. Defendants 1 and 2 in O. S. NO. 641 of 1988 are the appellants and both the plaintiffs and defendants 3 and 4 in o. S. No. 641 of 1988 are respondents 1 to 4 respectively in L. P. A. No. 11 of 1998. Second appellant and respondents 1 and 2 in l. P. A. No. 11 of 1988 are the plaintiffs and defendants respectively in O. S. No. 1369 of 1989. Both the suits, O. S. Nos. 641 of 1988 and 1369 of 1989, were tried and disposed of together by a common judgment by the trial court and similarly C. C. C. A. No. 131 of 1994 and Tr. C. C. C. A. No. 26 of 1995 were also
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top