C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, G.BIKSHAPATHY
M. Krishna Rao – Appellant
Versus
M. L. Narasimha Rao – Respondent
( 1 ) SINCE both the appeals are interconnected, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
( 2 ) L. P. A. NO. 11 of 1998 arises out of C. C. C. A. NO. 131 of 1994, which arose out of o. S. NO. 641 of 1988 on the file of the Court of iv Additional Judge, City Civil Court, hyderabad. L. P. A. No. 65 of 1998 arises out of Tr. C. C. C. A. No. 26 of 1995, which arose out of O. S. No. 1369 of 1989 on the file of the court of IV Additional Judge, City Civil court, Hyderabad, which was originally instituted as O. S. No. 4528 of 1987 on the file of the Court of VII Assistant Judge, City civil Court, Hyderabad. Defendants 1 and 2 in O. S. NO. 641 of 1988 are the appellants and both the plaintiffs and defendants 3 and 4 in o. S. No. 641 of 1988 are respondents 1 to 4 respectively in L. P. A. No. 11 of 1998. Second appellant and respondents 1 and 2 in l. P. A. No. 11 of 1988 are the plaintiffs and defendants respectively in O. S. No. 1369 of 1989. Both the suits, O. S. Nos. 641 of 1988 and 1369 of 1989, were tried and disposed of together by a common judgment by the trial court and similarly C. C. C. A. No. 131 of 1994 and Tr. C. C. C. A. No. 26 of 1995 were also
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.