SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 695

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, C.V.RAMULU
Canara Bank, Bangalore – Appellant
Versus
S. Ramalingam – Respondent


C. V. RAMULU, J.

( 1 ) THIS writ appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge made in WP No. 30101 of 2000 dated 6-11-2000.

( 2 ) BY the above said order, the learned single Judge directed the 1st respondent to consider the case of the petitioner to fix his pay at Rs. 590. 40 ps. from the date of his permanent absorption under the respondents as per the directives issued by the government of India, Ministry of Defence vide proceedings dated 28-2-1996 with all consequential and attendant benefits including arrears of pay within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the said order.

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the writ petitioner, he is entitled for fixation of his salary at rs. 590. 40 ps. as per the instructions of the government of India, Ministry of Defence in their proceedings No. Air/hq/23043/1004/ sr/pc-3/434/d (Civ-H) dated 28-2-1996. It was also stated that the petitioner was an ex-serviceman served in the Indian Army from 13-2-1959 to 21-11-1967. Thereafter, from 29-3-1968 to 25-6-1979 he served as a Telephone Operator in the Air Force station, Hakimpet, Secunderabad. Thereafter, he was permanently absorbed in the quota of ex-serviceman in the responde





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top