SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 701

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, C.V.RAMULU
Chief Manager, Personnel and HRD Section, State Bank of India, Zonal Office, tirupathi, Chittoor District – Appellant
Versus
K. Lakshmamma – Respondent


B. SUDERSHAN REDDY, J, J.

( 1 ) THE unsuccessful plaintiff is the appellant, who filed the appeal against the judgment and decree dated 20. 12. 1994 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, markapur in O. S. No. 93 of 1987. The suit was filed for partition and separate possession of the plaintiff s half share in the plaint A and B schedule properties and for future profits and costs.

( 2 ) THE facts lie in a narrow compass: The plaintiff and the defendant are brothers and members of a Joint Hindu family. Their father by name Pullaiah died in the year 1969 leaving no ancestral properties. He had four sons. The eldest and the second son got themselves divided and left the family. The plaintiff and the defendant continued as the members of the joint family even subsequent to the death of their father and continued the Coffee powder business. They also started Ice fruit manufacturing business in the year 1980. The Coffee Powder business thrived well and they could make substantial profits out of their business. They acquired thus plaint A and B schedule properties, which are their joint properties. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendant used to maintain the accounts and mani











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top