DEVINDER GUPTA, J.

( 1 ) APPELLANTS filed writ petition which was dismissed by the impugned order by the learned single Judge on the ground that appellants can only seek redressal by filing review petition or appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent but another writ petition virtually challenging the directions issued in earlier writ petition being writ petition No. 22948 of 2002 is not maintainable.

( 2 ) APPELLANTS claimed that they were owners and possessors on the basis of D form pattas granted in their favour in the year 1972 with respect to various parcels of land situate in Buddivalasa Agraharam village, hamlet of B. Tallavalasa, Padmanabham mandal, Visakhapatnam district. They claim that one Reddipalli Sanyasi Rao and his four sons (respondents 5 to 8) have frequently been quarrelling with them and other adjacent D form patta holders alleging fabricated and sham documents of agreement of sale in their favour which necessitated in appellants filing representations before the Superintendent of Police, Visakhapatnam. It is stated that civil suits are also filed. While the civil suits were pending, appellants came to know that some orders are procured by the sons of Reddip

Click Here to Read the rest of this document