SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 759

B.PRAKASH RAO
United India Insurance Co. Ltd, Hyderabad – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Khaj Rasool Sayyed and Mohd. Khajamain Shaik – Respondent


B. PRAKASH RAO, J.

( 1 ) ALL these appeals are being heard along with other connected matters in view of the common question involved mainly whether in the case of injuries and for compensation therefor, in the absence of medical, oral evidence in support of the documents which include the certificates and bills etc. , can be accepted or relied on for the purpose of determining the quantum.

( 2 ) BEFORE proceeding to decide the question, it is necessary to delve into certain facts involved in these appeals.

( 3 ) C. M. A. No. 1760 of 1999 is at the instance of the insurance company which is aggrieved against the award of compensation under Section 166 (1) of the Motor Vehicles act read with 455 of the rules framed thereunder, awarding a compensation of rs. 2,00,000/-, with interest at 12% per annum from the date of the application fixing the liability jointly and severally against the insurance company and also the owner of the vehicle involved. On 19. 9. 1996, the claimant, who was working as a driver on the Jeep bearing No. AAA 1969 (T) was proceeding from Bellampalli to Manchiryal and when the Jeep reached near Bokkalagutta bus stage, suddenly a buffalo came across the road, the



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top