SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 780

C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, G.BIKSHAPATHY
Kavitha Goud – Appellant
Versus
Nookala Sudarshan Reddy – Respondent


C. Y. SOMAYAJULU, J.

( 1 ) QUONDAM minor plaintiff in O. S. No. 924 of 1984 on the file of the Court of IV Additional Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad is the appellant. The suit was filed on her behalf by her father and guardian, inter alia for the relief of possession of the plaint schedule property, which is a house bearing No. 3-4-495/1 at barkatpura, Hyderabad in approximately 1,147 Sq. Yds. , within the boundaries mentioned in the schedule appended to the plaint (hereinafter referred to as the suit property ), which earlier was a part of the house bearing No. 3-4-495, after ejecting the respondents therefrom and for past and future mesne profits. For the sake of convenience the parties would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the Trial Court.

( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff, in brief, in the amended plaint is, second defendant is the son of the first defendant, who is the son of the third defendant. Fourth defendant is a tenant in respect of a part of the suit property. Third defendant, who was the absolute owner of the suit property, being his self-acquired property, while undergoing treatment as an in-patient in the gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad, sold it to

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top