C.Y.SOMAYAJULU, G.BIKSHAPATHY
Kavitha Goud – Appellant
Versus
Nookala Sudarshan Reddy – Respondent
( 1 ) QUONDAM minor plaintiff in O. S. No. 924 of 1984 on the file of the Court of IV Additional Judge, city Civil Court, Hyderabad is the appellant. The suit was filed on her behalf by her father and guardian, inter alia for the relief of possession of the plaint schedule property, which is a house bearing No. 3-4-495/1 at barkatpura, Hyderabad in approximately 1,147 Sq. Yds. , within the boundaries mentioned in the schedule appended to the plaint (hereinafter referred to as the suit property ), which earlier was a part of the house bearing No. 3-4-495, after ejecting the respondents therefrom and for past and future mesne profits. For the sake of convenience the parties would hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed in the Trial Court.
( 2 ) THE case of the plaintiff, in brief, in the amended plaint is, second defendant is the son of the first defendant, who is the son of the third defendant. Fourth defendant is a tenant in respect of a part of the suit property. Third defendant, who was the absolute owner of the suit property, being his self-acquired property, while undergoing treatment as an in-patient in the gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad, sold it to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.