N.V.RAMANA
S. Rami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Vice-Chairman and Managing Director – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this batch of 128 writ petitions, the petitioners, who are employed in the Work Charged Establishment and Provincial Establishment of the A. P. State Irrigation Development Corporation (for short the Corporation), as executive Engineers, Deputy Executive Engineers, Work Managers, Assistant executive Engineers, Assistant Engineers, Work Inspectors, Assistant geophysicists/assistant Hydrogeologists, Draftsmen, Electricians, Fitters, riggers, H. Ms. , N. T. Ms. , M. Ms. , P. Os. , Drillers, Tracers, Stenographers, assistant Section Officers, Assistants, Typists, Drivers, Helpers, cleaners, Lascars, Watchman, etc. , are assailing the individual notices issued to them by the respondent-Corporation, identifying them as surplus staff and requiring them to opt for VRS, on a number of grounds. Though a number of grounds have been urged by the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of this batch of writ petitions, they in essence have sought to attack their very identification as surplus, requiring them to opt for VRS. Inasmuch as the issues involved in this batch of writ petitions, are more or less identical, they were heard together and are being disposed
THRESSIA C NIDHIYIRI JOINT PROPRIETOR NIDHIYIRI Vs KURIAN A P PRESIDENT EZHATTUMUGHAM RUBBER
VET India Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh
Govt.of A.P. Vs Medwin Educational Society
V.Devaiah Vs Superintendent of Police, Karimnagar(Per S.B.Sinha, C.J.)
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Vs BALAMUSALAIAH
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.