SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 769

N.V.RAMANA
S. Rami Reddy – Appellant
Versus
Vice-Chairman and Managing Director – Respondent


N. V. RAMANA, J.

( 1 ) IN this batch of 128 writ petitions, the petitioners, who are employed in the Work Charged Establishment and Provincial Establishment of the A. P. State Irrigation Development Corporation (for short the Corporation), as executive Engineers, Deputy Executive Engineers, Work Managers, Assistant executive Engineers, Assistant Engineers, Work Inspectors, Assistant geophysicists/assistant Hydrogeologists, Draftsmen, Electricians, Fitters, riggers, H. Ms. , N. T. Ms. , M. Ms. , P. Os. , Drillers, Tracers, Stenographers, assistant Section Officers, Assistants, Typists, Drivers, Helpers, cleaners, Lascars, Watchman, etc. , are assailing the individual notices issued to them by the respondent-Corporation, identifying them as surplus staff and requiring them to opt for VRS, on a number of grounds. Though a number of grounds have been urged by the learned counsel for the petitioners in support of this batch of writ petitions, they in essence have sought to attack their very identification as surplus, requiring them to opt for VRS. Inasmuch as the issues involved in this batch of writ petitions, are more or less identical, they were heard together and are being disposed













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top