SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 646

B.SUDERSHAN REDDY, C.V.RAMULU
Sri Sai Sreenivasa Constructions, Cuddapah District – Appellant
Versus
T. Siva Prasad Reddy – Respondent


( 1 ) THESE writ appeals are filed being aggrieved by the Order of the learned single Judge in Writ Petition no. 13064 of 1999, dated 24-8-2000. While, respondents 1 and 2 in the said Writ Petition filed Writ Appeal No. 1355 of 2000, respondent Nos. 3 and 4 filed Writ Appeal nos. 1293 and 1332 of 2000 respectively.

( 2 ) THE parties are hereinafter referred to as arrayed in the Writ Petition. The brief facts, which are necessary for the disposal of these appeals, are as under:

( 3 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner, he is a public spirited citizen and was the Chairman of Rayachoti Rural Electricity Supply co-operative Society during 1997-98. He is the Convener of the Anna Telugu Desam party for Lakkireddipalle Assembly constituency, Cuddapah District. To espouse the public cause in the public interest, this writ Petition was filed. He stated that the engineer-in-Chief, Roads and Buildings department, Hyderabad issued a tender notification dated 17-7-1998 for various works including items 1 to 8 pertaining to improvements to the existing road described as carriageway from KM 54/0 to KM 93/0 of Rajampet-Tumkur Road. Each item of work was divided into a separate reach for a distance of 5






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top