SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 667

V.V.S.RAO
Ch. Madan Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad – Respondent


V. V. S. RAO, J.

( 1 ) AN interesting question as to authority and power of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) to regulate the parking area and levy parking fee on vehicles parked thereat inside a private commercial complex falls for consideration in these writ petitions. Therefore, all the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.

( 2 ) THE petitioners claim to be agreement holders/licensees for collection of parking fee from the visitors in commercial complexes like Amrutha Mall, Rahmat Complex, Aditya Enclave. Navakethan Building, White House and Divyashakthi Apartments. It is their case that as per the agreement/contract they have exclusive privilege of collecting parking fee from visitors who come to the commercial complex for their business as well as other needs. In most of the cases, it is valid for a period of one to two years and the licensee is entitled to collect parking fee on four wheelers and two wheelers as stipulated in the agreement. It is the case of the petitioners that they have parted with substantial amounts as security deposit and they are required to pay substantial amount as rental. The details as to when various complexes were co





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top