V.V.S.RAO
Ch. Madan Mohan – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad – Respondent
( 1 ) AN interesting question as to authority and power of the Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad (MCH) to regulate the parking area and levy parking fee on vehicles parked thereat inside a private commercial complex falls for consideration in these writ petitions. Therefore, all the writ petitions are being disposed of by this common order.
( 2 ) THE petitioners claim to be agreement holders/licensees for collection of parking fee from the visitors in commercial complexes like Amrutha Mall, Rahmat Complex, Aditya Enclave. Navakethan Building, White House and Divyashakthi Apartments. It is their case that as per the agreement/contract they have exclusive privilege of collecting parking fee from visitors who come to the commercial complex for their business as well as other needs. In most of the cases, it is valid for a period of one to two years and the licensee is entitled to collect parking fee on four wheelers and two wheelers as stipulated in the agreement. It is the case of the petitioners that they have parted with substantial amounts as security deposit and they are required to pay substantial amount as rental. The details as to when various complexes were co
Governors of the Peabody Donation Fund v. Sir Lindsay Parkinson and Co. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.