SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 807

M.NARAYANA REDDY
Enugu Thirupathi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent


M. NARAYANA REDDY, J.

( 1 ) THIS Judgment according to Law based on the legal material placed, on Record, arises out of a Criminal Appeal, filed by the sole appellant, against the sole respondent, under sub-section (2) of Section 374, Cr. P. C. , 1973, questioning the, validity and legality, of the adjudications made by, and set forth in para 2, infra.

( 2 ) JUDGMENT, dated 14-3-11997, of the court of the II Add1. Sessions Judge, karimnagar (Trial Court), made in S. C. No. 353/96, of its file.

( 3 ) PERUSED the material papers of the record.

( 4 ) ARGUMENTS were heard of the learned counsel for the sole appellant, and the learned Add1. Public Prosecutor for the sole respondent-State.

( 5 ) THE sole appellant in this Criminal appeal corresponds to the sole accused in the said S. C. No. 353/96, of the file of the said trial Court. The sole respondent herein corresponds to the sole complainant in the said Sessions Case, being the State of A. P. , represented by the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Peddapalli.

( 6 ) THE parties are, here-in-after, referred to, with reference to their respective descriptions before the said Trial Court, unless, otherwise, so specified.

( 7 ) THE safd




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top