M.NARAYANA REDDY
Enugu Thirupathi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State Of A. P. – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS Judgment according to Law based on the legal material placed, on Record, arises out of a Criminal Appeal, filed by the sole appellant, against the sole respondent, under sub-section (2) of Section 374, Cr. P. C. , 1973, questioning the, validity and legality, of the adjudications made by, and set forth in para 2, infra.
( 2 ) JUDGMENT, dated 14-3-11997, of the court of the II Add1. Sessions Judge, karimnagar (Trial Court), made in S. C. No. 353/96, of its file.
( 3 ) PERUSED the material papers of the record.
( 4 ) ARGUMENTS were heard of the learned counsel for the sole appellant, and the learned Add1. Public Prosecutor for the sole respondent-State.
( 5 ) THE sole appellant in this Criminal appeal corresponds to the sole accused in the said S. C. No. 353/96, of the file of the said trial Court. The sole respondent herein corresponds to the sole complainant in the said Sessions Case, being the State of A. P. , represented by the Assistant Superintendent of Police, Peddapalli.
( 6 ) THE parties are, here-in-after, referred to, with reference to their respective descriptions before the said Trial Court, unless, otherwise, so specified.
( 7 ) THE safd
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.