SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(AP) 811

S.R.K.PRASAD
Assistant Inspector of Factories, Guntur – Appellant
Versus
Nukala Samabasiva Rao – Respondent


S. R. K. PRASAD, J.

( 1 ) THIS Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment in STC No. 326 of 1997, on the file of the VII Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Guntur, convicting the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 700/- in default to undergo si for 15 days for the offences under Sec. 67 of the Factories Act 1948, read with Secs. 14 and 15 of the Child Labour (Prohibition and regulation) Act, 1986 (for short the Labour act ).

( 2 ) THE factual matrix that led to filing of this case can be stated in brief as follows: the Inspector of Factories I, Guntur, visited the Sri Sambasiva Cotton Traders, ankireddipalem, on 29-1-1997 at 5 p. m. He noticed V. Bujji, aged 12 years, R. Sunitha, aged 10 years, T. Varalaxmi, aged 10 years, r. Anitha, aged 10 years, and V. Vidya Rani, aged 11 years working in the said factory. Thereupon, he obtained sanction under section 105 (1) of the Factories Act and presented STC No. 326 of 1997 before the VII additional Munsif Magistrate, alleging violation of Section 67 of the Factories Act r/w Sections 14 and 15 of the Child Labour prohibition and Regulation Act of 1986. On the strength of admission made by the accused, the magistrate proceeded unde











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top